spongebob

Senin, 24 Agustus 2015

Mini Thesis (A Study of Semiotics)



BALLOONS AND GOGGLES AS SYMBOLS OF ADVENTUROUS SPIRIT RFLECTED IN PETE DOCTER’S UP
(A Study of Semiotics)
Submitted to complete task of Literary Research Methodology
Lecturer: Atinia Hidayah, SS, M.Hum.


FITRI ANDRIYANI
679202120019

DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE
SCIENCE AND QUR’ANIC UNIVERSITY (UNSIQ)
2015
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION

A.    Background of the Study
Literary workhas several categories which consist of different characteristics, not only poem, poetry, drama, novel, but also movie, music and others. Movie is one of literature work that has similar elements with novel, like theme, character, setting and others. According to James Monaco, “Film is a medium and an art, but it is also, uniquely, a very complex technological undertaking (Monaco, 2000:17).
There are three main categories movie: the first is feature movie, it is a work of fiction, the form is always narrative structure, the scenario could adaptation from novel or short story. The second is documentaries movie, it isnonfiction movie, describes the real life situationseach individual, describe the feelings and experiences in real situations. And the last is animation movie, it is a technique the use of movie to create the illusion of movement from the illustration collection of two or three-dimensional objects. Today, almost all animated movie are made digitally with computers, and animated movie is most popular than other.
One of country that produce animated movie is United States. The beginning of animated cartoon in United States is in 1900s through 1920s, it is the Silent Era. Animated cartoon that produced in this era is like Mighty Mouse, Betty Boop, and Woody Woodpecker. The second era is in 1930s through 1950s, it is the Golden Age of American animation. Animated cartoon that produced in this era is like Silly Symphonies, Mickey Mouse, and Donald Duck. 
The third era is in 1960s through Mid-1980s, it is the television era of animation in the United States. And the last era isinLate-1980s through present, it is the Modern Animation in the United States. In this era, the rise of computer animation, for both 2D and 3D is used. There are so many animated cartoons produced in this era. One of them is Up.
Up is American 3D computer-animated cartoon produced by Pixar Animation Studios and released by Walt Disney Pictures. Up was released on May 29, 2009 and opened the 2009 Cannes Film Festival, becoming the first animated and 3D film to do so. It is directed by Pete Docter, the movie focused on an old man named Carl Fredricksen who brought his home fly with thousands of balloons. In 78-year-old, Carl sets out to fulfill his dream to see the Paradise Falls of South America and to complete a promise made to his late wife. This movie received five Academy Award nominations, including Best Picture, making it the second animated movie in history to receive such a nomination (and Pixar's first Best Picture nomination), following Beauty and the Beast.
According to Thomas, “Human intellectual and social life is based on the production,use, and exchange of signs and representations. When we gesture,talk, write, read, watch a TV program, listen to music, look at apainting, etc. we are engaged in sign-based representational behaviour (Thomas A. Sebeok, 2001: 8). Movie consists of many symbols, and the symbols consist of various symbol systems that work together to reach the expected effect. Like in Pete Docter’sUp, there are many symbols in this movie. It is related to the characters in this movie.


B.     Statement of the Problem
The problem in this research is:
How is balloons and goggles as symbols of adventurous spirit reflected in Pete Docter’sUp?

C.    Object of the Study
To find out how is balloons and goggles as symbols of adventurous spirit reflected inPete Docter’sUp.

D.    Scope of the Study
In this minithesis the writer limited the focus of the study on analyzing the symbolof balloons and goggles related the social issue. It is because the film shows many symbols related to many aspects of live by using symbol, picture, terminology, or conversation in the scene of the Up. The research is intended to analyze symbol’s interpretation of the main character with many aspects of  life which influence his life.

E.     Significance of the Study
This study is expected to give some benefits. The following are the benefits of the study:
1.      To show howis balloons and goggles as symbols of adventurous spirit reflected in Pete Docter’sUp.
2.      This study is expected to give some contributions to readers who would like to learn about Pete Docter’sUp, especially the symbols.
3.      This study is expected to be the next reference for subsequent researchers who are interested in this topic.
F.     Organization of the Study
The writer divided this thesis into five chapters. The followings are the organization of the study:
Chapter I Introduction consists of Background of the Study, Statement of the Problems, Object of the Study, Scope of the Study, and Significance of the Study.
Chapter II Review related to Literature consists of Semiotics, Ferdinand de Saussure’s Semiotics and Sign Signifier Signified.
Chapter III Research Method consists of Research Design, Object of the Study, Types of Data, and Procedures of Collecting Data.
Chapter IV Analysis consists of data analysis which answers the questions stated in the problem statement.
Chapter V Consists of Conclusion.



CHAPTER II
REVIEW RELATED TO LITERATURE
The writer will present some references which are in line with the topic. It includes Semiotics, Ferdinand de Saussure’s Semiotics, and Sign Signifier Signified.
A.    Semiotics
Semiotics and Semiology has same meaning,although the use one of the two terms are usually indicates the users thought, those who followed Peirce uses Semiotics, and those who followed Saussure uses Semiology. Both of them are the study of signs, symbols, and signification. It is the study of how meaning is created. As quoted by Alex, Christomy stated that “There is a tendency; Semiotics is more popular than Semiology, so that Saussure’s followers also use it”(Alex, 2003:12). It means that the follower of Pierce’s terms is more than Saussure.
According to Saussure’s definition about Semiotics:
“Semiology is a science that examines the life of signs in society, and thus, become a part of the discipline of social psychology. The purpose is to show how the formation of signs and the rules that govern it. The Semiotician France retained the term of semiology because they want to emphasize the difference between the works of Semiology with the works of Semiotics that now famous in Eastern Europe, Italy and the United States”.
(Budiman, 1999: 107)

While the Semiotics terms that appear in the late 19th century by the Americanphilosopher, Charles Sanders Peirce refers to the formal doctrine of signs, became the basis of Semiotic is the concept of the sign,not only language and communication system arranged by signs, but also the world itself, related the human mind.
In addition to the definition of Semiotics above: “Semioticsor Semiology is the study of signs, symbols, and signification. It is the study of how meaning is created, not what it is. Below are some brief definitions of semiotic terms, beginning with the smallest unit of meaning and proceeding towards the larger and more complex”.
            From the quotation above, Semiotics or Semiology is the study of how to create the meaning of signs, symbols and significations, from the smallest unit to the larger until more complex meaning.

B.     Ferdinand de Saussure’s Semiotics
Ferdinand de Saussure (1857 –1913) was a Swiss linguist and semiotician whose ideas laid a foundation for many significant developments both in linguistics and semiology in the 20th century. He is one of two major fathers of semiotics which he called semiology. Saussure's theory has been particularly influential in the study of linguistic signs.
Saussure took the sign as the organizing concept for linguistic structure, using it to express the conventional nature of language.Instead of focusing his theory on the origins of language and its historical aspects, Saussure concentrated on the patterns and functions of language instead. Although the name has been changed to semiotics, Saussure's theory is still commonly used in today's society. He also believed that the relationship that exists between the signifier and the signified is purely arbitrary and analytical.
As quoted by Budiman, Saussure stated that “Semiology is a knowledge which study of sign in the society, and it is the part of social psychology discipline, the function is to show how the sign is created” (Budiman, 1999: 107). There are five views of Saussure which became the basis of Levi-Strauss structuralism, they are signifier and signified, form and content, language and parole, synchronic and diachronic, syntagmatic and associative.

C.    Sign, Signifier, Signified
Saussure offered a 'dyadic' or two-part model of the sign. He defined a sign as being composed of signifier and signified. Saussure said that the signifier and the signified cannot be separated, they are like a single sheet of paper, and it is represented in the Saussurean diagram by the arrows.

Signified
Signifier
sign
 




                        Saussure makes the distinction in these terms:
“A linguistic sign is not a link between a thing and a name, but between a concept [signified] and a sound pattern [signifier]. The sound pattern is not actually a sound; for a sound is something physical. A sound pattern is the hearer’s psychological impression of a sound, as given to him by the evidence of his senses. This sound pattern may be called a ‘material’ element only in that it is the representation of our sensory impressions. The sound pattern may thus be distinguished from the other element associated with it in a linguistic sign. This other element is generally of a more abstract kind: the concept”. (Saussure, 1983: 66)


In semiotics, sign is something that can be interpreted and have a meaning, which is something other than itself, and which is able to give information to the one interpreting. The sign according to Ferdinand de Saussure is related with dyadic, consisting only of a form of the sign (the signifier) and its meaning (the signified). . As quoted by Alex, Derrida stated that “A symbol is a sign which refers to the object that is denotes by virtue of a law, usually an association of general ideas, which operates to cause the symbol to be interpreted as referring to that object” (Alex, 2003: 156).
Saussure states that the relationship between a sign and the real-world thing it denotes is an arbitrary one.The signs weuse gain their meaning, not from what they are, but what they are not. Their meaning is established by the signs we chose not to use. What defines a chair as a chair is the fact that it is not a table, it is different from a table.
According to Saussure, the signifier is a social fact, physically and materially there, prior to the intention of the individual communicator. The signifier is commonly interpreted as the material form of the sign, it is something which can be seen, heard, touched, smelt or tasted. It is in the interpretation of the signifier that meaning is created.For example the signifier is the phonetic sound “tree” (when spoken) or the imprint “tree” (when written), the signified is the concept tree. Together they make the sign “tree”.
The signified is the concept, the meaning, the thing indicated by the signifier. It need not be a 'real object' but is some referent to which the signifier refers. The thing signified is created in the perceiver and is internal to them.
As quoted by Alex, Bertens stated that “Signified is the reflection of mental, idea, or concept. Signified is the mental aspect of language” (Alex, 2003: 46).
A signifier without signified has no meaning, and the signified changes with person and context. The relationship between the signifier and the signified is arbitrary. Saussure inverts the usual reflections view that the signifier reflects the signified: the signifier creates the signified in terms of the meaning it triggers for us. The meaning of a sign needs both the signifier and the signified as created by an interpreter. A signified without a signifier is impossible. According to Saussure, sound in a word is signifier, while the concept is signified.






CHAPTER III
METHOD OF RESEARCH
This chapter consists of research design, objective of the study, types of data, and procedures of collecting data.
A.    Research Design
This research is a library research in the form of descriptive qualitative one. Descriptive qualitative is the research to describe and to analyze phenomenon on event. Social activity, attitude, perception and action of personal and several groups people guiding.

B.     Object of the Study
The object of the study is a play entitled Up directed by Pete Docter and released in May 29, 2009. The play is in duration 1:36:07 (it is the one of play collection of American Animated Cartoon). In this study, the writer focuses on the symbol of Semiotics theory.

C.    Types of Data
Since the object of this thesis is a play, there are many pictures which has symbol. Therefore, the types of main data are taken for data analysis in the form of picture that shows between the characters in the play.

D.    Procedures of Collecting Data
The procedures ofcollecting data are as follow:
1.      Watching
Watching is the main step to understand the content of the story of the play entitled Up. It is also assists the writer to find which part of the play will be analyzed related to the topic.
2.      Identifying
Identifying means the activity of separating between data and non-data by showing the images in the movie which will be analyzed related to the topic.
3.      Classifying
To make it easy to answer the problem, the identified data has to be classified based on the problem statement. There is one problem to be solved in this study, thus the writer classified the identified data based on the problem statement.
4.      Selecting
In selecting the data, the technique used is relevancy technique. It means that onlyrelevant data which will be selected to answer the problem.






Sabtu, 13 Juni 2015

Sociology of Literature



Fitri Andriyani
6th Semester
Sociology of Literature
HEDONISM OF MATHILDE LOISEL IN
GUY DE MAUPASSANT’S THE DIAMOND NECKLACE

In the beginning of the story, Mathilde is one of women in middle class, but she is unhappy with her place in society. She is not satisfied because with her beauty, she thinks she should be wearing beautiful clothes and lived in well condition.
“The girl was one of those pretty and charming young creatures who sometimes are born, as if by a slip of fate, into a family of clerks. She had no dowry, no expectations, no way of being known, understood, loved, married by any rich and distinguished man; so she let herself be married to a little clerk of the Ministry of Public Instruction. She dressed plainly because she could not dress well, but she was unhappy as if she had really fallen from a higher station; since with women there is neither caste nor rank, for beauty, grace and charm takes the place of family and birth. Natural ingenuity, instinct for what is elegant, a supple mind are their sole hierarchy, and often make of women of the people the equals of the very greatest ladies. Mathilde suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born to enjoy all delicacies and all luxuries. ”. (Guy de Mauppasant, The Diamond Necklace, 1884)
The quotation above is about Mathilde’s condition. She is beautiful, pretty and charming woman, but she could not dress well because of her live condition. She married with poor men who work as a little clerk of Minister of Public Instruction that make Mathilde more suffer.
            Mathilde’s husband was comfortable with his place in society, while she hates and disappointed with her live condition.
“When she sat down to dinner, before the round table covered with a tablecloth in use three days, opposite her husband, who uncovered the soup tureen and declared with a delighted air, "Ah, the good soup! I don't know anything better than that," she thought of dainty dinners, of shining silverware, of tapestry that peopled the walls with ancient personages and with strange birds flying in the midst of a fairy forest; and she thought of delicious dishes served on marvellous plates and of the whispered gallantries to which you listen with a sphinxlike smile while you are eating the pink meat of a trout or the wings of a quail. She had no gowns, no jewels, nothing. And she loved nothing but that. She felt made for that. She would have liked so much to please, to be envied, to be charming, to be sought after”. (Guy de Maupassant, The Diamond Necklace, 1884)
Loisel try to make enjoy their dinner with saying that he feels satisfied with the soup. He wants to make her wife happy, while Mathilde is always thinking about the luxuriousness and the upper class live condition that she wants.
            Loisel want to make his wife happy with bring an invitation from the Minister of Public Instruction where Loisel works.
“…The Minister of Public Instruction and Madame Georges Ramponneau request the honor of M. and Madame Loisel's company at the palace of the Ministry on Monday evening, January 18th.
Instead of being delighted, as her husband had hoped, she threw the invitation on the table crossly, muttering:
"What do you wish me to do with that?"
"Why, my dear, I thought you would be glad. You never go out, and this is such a fine opportunity. I had great trouble to get it. Every one wants to go; it is very select, and they are not giving many invitations to clerks. The whole official world will be there."
She looked at him with an irritated glance and said impatiently:
"And what do you wish me to put on my back?"”. (Guy de Maupassant, The Diamond Necklace, 1884)
Loisel try to make his wife happy with the invitation, he tell to his wife that he was very difficult to get the invitation and the it is just for the people in upper class and there will be people from the upper class, so that they have opportunity to take a part as the upper class, but Mathilde refuse it and she won’t to go to the party.
            Mathilde feels give up, she can’t go to the party. She complains to her husband that she doesn’t have dress which proper to wear in the party and she suggest that the invitation should to give to another.
            “What's the matter? What's the matter?" he answered.
By a violent effort she conquered her grief and replied in a calm voice, while she wiped her wet cheeks:
"Nothing. Only I have no gown, and, therefore, I can't go to this ball. Give your card to some colleague whose wife is better equipped than I am
He was in despair. He resumed:
"Come, let us see, Mathilde. How much would it cost, a suitable gown, which you could use on other occasions--something very simple?"”. (Guy de Maupassant, The Diamond Necklace, 1884)
Loisel really loves his wife, he wants to make his wife happy. He persuades his wife to go to the party with give some money to buy a new dress, while actually he wants to use the money to buy a gun for himself.
            After Mathilde gets a dress to wear in the party, she complains again to her husband that she has no jewelry to wear with the dress.
            “"What is the matter? Come, you have seemed very queer these last three days."
And she answered:
"It annoys me not to have a single piece of jewelry, not a single ornament, nothing to put on. I shall look poverty-stricken. I would almost rather not go at all."
"You might wear natural flowers," said her husband. "They're very stylish at this time of year. For ten francs you can get two or three magnificent roses."
She was not convinced.          
"No; there's nothing more humiliating than to look poor among other women who are rich."”. (Guy de Maupassant, The Diamond Necklace, 1884)
Loisel suggest his wife to use natural flower, but Mathilde refuse it. She doesn’t hear what his husband said and she just thinking about herself who need jewelry, said that it just make her look more poor people.
            Loisel try to resolve his wife’s problem with suggest to borrow jewelry to Madame Forestier, Mathilde’s friend, and she agree with her husband.
She saw first some bracelets, then a pearl necklace, then a Venetian gold cross set with precious stones, of admirable workmanship. She tried on the ornaments before the mirror, hesitated and could not make up her mind to part with them, to give them back. She kept asking:
"Haven't you any more?"
"Why, yes. Look further; I don't know what you like."
Suddenly she discovered, in a black satin box, a superb diamond necklace, and her heart throbbed with an immoderate desire. Her hands trembled as she took it. She fastened it round her throat, outside her high-necked waist, and was lost in ecstasy at her reflection in the mirror.
Then she asked, hesitating, filled with anxious doubt:
"Will you lend me this, only this?"”. (Guy de Maupassant, The Diamond Necklace, 1884)
Mathilde is one of the dissatisfaction people. Madame Forestier show some her jewelry and Mathilde wants to more and she choose the diamond necklace to borrow and to wear in the party.
At the party, Mathilde become prettier than other woman, she feels like a rich woman with a new dress and the diamond necklace.
“The night of the ball arrived. Madame Loisel was a great success. She was prettier than any other woman present, elegant, graceful, smiling and wild with joy. All the men looked at her, asked her name, sought to be introduced. All the attaches of the Cabinet wished to waltz with her. She was remarked by the minister himself.
She danced with rapture, with passion, intoxicated by pleasure, forgetting all in the triumph of her beauty, in the glory of her success, in a sort of cloud of happiness comprised of all this homage, admiration, these awakened desires and of that sense of triumph which is so sweet to woman's heart”. (Guy de Maupassant, The Diamond Necklace, 1884)
In the party, all of men look at her and want to dance with her. Mathilde was very happy and feel satisfied because she can feel like a rich woman and she can to be what she wants. She feels like a high class society and her society of course accept her because she can show that she is a member of high class. She enjoys the party with dancing with other men and include with women in high class. Loisel leave his wife to enjoy the party. At the party, Mathilde dancing, laugh and gets the experience that she thought she was born to enjoy.


References:
·         http://www.enotes.com/topics/guy-de-maupassant/in-depth
·         http://www.enotes.com/topics/guy-de-maupassant/themes